Gaps in the Animal Welfare Bill

The recent animal welfare bill represents an important step forward in strengthening protections for animals across the country. It is encouraging to see long‑standing concerns finally being addressed in legislation, and many of the measures within the bill reflect years of campaigning by welfare organisations, parliamentarians, and members of the public. 

But as with any major piece of legislation, there is always more to do. That became especially clear during my recent visit to our local Cats Protection centre, where I had the chance to see their work first-hand and hear directly about the challenges they face every day. 

The purpose of the visit was simple: to understand how national policy translates into real‑world outcomes for cats and the people who care for them.  

While they welcomed the progress made in the animal welfare bill, they also highlighted areas where cats are still not receiving the attention they deserve. Their experience offers valuable insight into how future legislation and guidance could be strengthened. 

Several issues came up in our discussion: 

Crossbreeding and welfare concerns: The rise in breeds such as Bengals, which originate from wild cats, is creating new welfare challenges. Staff explained that although worrying cat breeding trends are emerging, current policy remains focused on regulating dog breeding. If this issue continues to fly under the radar, we may end up seeing more dangerous breeds entering the domestic market, creating health and safety risks for humans and cats. 

Electronic shock collars: Although previously considered for restriction, plans to address their use have not moved forward this Parliament. This lack of progress leaves a significant gap in animal protection. Shock collars can cause pain, fear and long‑term behavioural problems, and their continued availability risks normalising training methods that rely on punishment rather than welfare‑led approaches.  

Microchipping: While compulsory microchipping is a positive step, the lack of a single, centralised database makes it difficult to reunite lost cats with their owners. The centre stressed how transformative a unified system would be, saving volunteers time and reducing the stress and strain placed on cats and their owners when they go missing. 

The team also spoke about an issue most pet owners are all too familiar with: the impact of fireworks. Each year, staff arrive after Bonfire Night to find bowls overturned and the animals visibly distressed. They are calling for clearer guidance and consideration of decibel limits - a balanced approach that protects both animal welfare and community celebrations. 

Taking these conversations forward 

Following the visit, I have written to the minister to share the concerns raised and encourage the Government to put the protection of cats on a level footing with that of dogs. 

Cats Protection is calling for stricter regulations on decibel levels, and I agree that we need a more balanced approach that protects both public enjoyment and animal welfare. The current system simply isn’t working.